Institution of False Cases
1 Persons making false complaint must be firmly dealt with; the High Court orders Inquiry against Complainant who allegedly filed false rape case.
2 The story that, a person has tried to outrage the modesty of two women, in the presence of two policemen is so unnatural, that there must be clear and unimpeachable evidence before it can be accepted.
3 The suppression of material facts, intentional suggestion of falsehood and non-application of mind goes to show that, this is a malicious prosecution.
4 Judicial Notice: The misuse of Section 498-A I.P.C. and the increased tendency of implicating relatives of the husband in matrimonial disputes.
5 The Magistrate should certainly scrutinize the allegations in the application with great care and caution to satisfy himself that it falls within the ambit of the DV Act.
6 Growing trend of accusing the police personnel on registration of Criminal Case by the offenders cannot be tolerated by the Courts.
7 Judicial Notice: It is shocking, rather a mind blowing fact that many innocent persons are victims of false implication under the SC/ST (POA) Act.
8 A Case where criminal proceedings were directed against a litigant for making false statement in Affidavit filed before Court.
9 A Case where High Court acquitted the Accused of Rape charges, while observing that, every part of the testimony of prosecutrix is infirm, doubtful and contradictory which does not pose confidence.
10 High Court took judicial notice of fact that there is tendency to file cases under Sections 354/509 in disputes between neighbours to settle scores.
11 A person, whose case is based on falsehood can be summarily thrown out at any stage of the litigation. Fraud vitiates all actions.
12 Suppression of material facts from the court of law, is actually playing fraud with the court, and equivalent to the expression of falsehood.
13 A Case where to get the F.I.R. quashed, High Court imposed cost of 1.00 Lakh for lying.
14 Guidelines by Karnataka High Court to prevent frauds in seeking Bail.
15 High Court quashed POCSO proceedings on the grounds that victim made statement u/s 164 of CrPC that Complaint filed by mother to extract money.
16 A Case of misuse of Judicial forum to harass opponent.
17 SC cautions Police officers as not to mechanically register FIR / invoke SC / ST provisions; and they must take into consideration the factual position.
18 A Case of Malicious Prosecution by State.
19 Easy access to justice should not be misused as a license to file misconceived or frivolous petitions.
20 SC observes: Police may have committed the murder in the process of arresting the deceased, and thereafter, falsely implicated the accused.