Legal Principle - A Plaint can be rejected on the grounds that the concerned Party has failed to place on record basic foundational documents, on which he has founded his claim:
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of plaintiff refuted the arguments and submitted that at the stage of hearing of this suit, the plaintiff would place before the Court appropriate material and this contention should not be entertained by this Court. I am inclined to accept the stand taken by defendant no.1.
If it was the stand of the plaintiff that said person was the subject of defendant no.1 and that said person was appointed under the bilateral trade agreement between India and defendant no.1, it was absolutely necessary for the plaintiff to place before the Court, certain documents in support of the aforesaid averments. A bare averment in the plaint by itself would not go in favour of the plaintiff.
Hence, the plaintiff has not been able to establish link between said person and defendant no.1. By now, it is well settled that it is necessary for the plaintiff to plead facts necessary to set out a specific cause of action against a party which cause of action can be ascertained on the basis of material produced before the Court in the nature of documents as well as the averments in the plaint. (Bombay High Court - 2011)